• otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m half convinced the blood is fake. There’s none on the monitor and all the shatter points are pretty uniform.

    • Not a newt@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The blood is too localized. Even a small cut will bleed all over the place, and definitely drip or run down the arm. That hand has finger paint on it.

    • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah that’s not blood. It’s too bright to be that dry, and you can even see the pen marks; that’s been colored with a pen, not even painted on. If there was that much blood, it wouldn’t be in that uniform color and thickness, the actual splattering pattern would be very different, and it certainly would have dripped between the fingers

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s not a monitor, it’s an iMac likely from the late teens.

      Thing is those will not break like that from just a fist. (I’ve taken them apart and the display panel is pretty shatter resistant, they tend to break in long cracks with little spidering of the panel) Esp, not the way it looks on the very left edge. That was a serious effort with a hammer or something much harder than a knuckle.

      Also, I agree with your assessment - there’s no blood on the keyboard or desk or embedded in the glass of the computer itself, and yeah, that kind of damage WILL see blood AND chunks of glass in the knuckles of the hand.

      Gotta call fake on this as well. Looks like the kid used a red sharpie on his hand.