• theolodis@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          So because a book that is over 1000 years old goes agains ToS of a few year old lemmy instance, you feel the need to burn it?

          Why wouldn’t you just ignore it? I think the real reason might be a different one, and you should probably evaluate your feelings to find that out.

          Remember, we all have internalised racism in us, the difference is just how aware we are of it, and how we handle it.

          • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, the real reason is that the followers of these books want to push their beliefs onto others, turn them into laws, and ignoring them won’t make them go away. In every place where the followers of these books became the majority, the minorities are extremely repressed. The last time we were entirely ruled by those books, it was known as the Dark Ages, but there are several other countries currently living in their own Dark Ages because of the same desert trilogy. That book literally says its followers should kill me and others just because of the way they were born, so fuck it, it deserves no respect from anyone, it has nothing to do with race, it’s 100% religion.

            • theolodis@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              The Qur’an literally teached to not take a life, “whoever takes a life—unless as a punishment for murder or mischief in the land—it will be as if they killed all of humanity; and whoever saves a life, it will be as if they saved all of humanity.” (https://quran.com/al-maidah/32)

              All verses about killing disbelievers are in the context of war, of the times when the early Muslims were under attack.

              Also, traditionally people of other religions were living a good life under muslim rule, because unlike Christianity, Islam forbids forced conversions.

              • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yeah, yeah, all these books say do A and don’t do A and the hypocrite choose which he likes better to say which is right and who’s the true Scotsman… theoretical or historical contexts matters little on street-level reality. Meanwhile, I can safely say all the crap I want about Christianism and even wear anti-Christian symbols, however one must watch his back if he does the same with Islam.

            • zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              The last time we were entirely ruled by those books, it was known as the Dark Ages

              But that’s a Europe thing you know.
              EDIT: actually western Europe.

              • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I thought that by always referring to books in the plural, calling it the desert trilogy, and mentioning the Dark Ages, it was obvious that I’m not singling out the burning of the Qur’an as good… in my country, it’s not Muslims who have infected politics and try to push religious law, but a sect of fundamentalist Christians… yet, the laws they want pale in comparison to sharia, so I feel sorry for countries with people on the streets calling for sharia.