• snackwifi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    This used to annoy me, but after realizing how many road deaths there are every year, I now see speed reduction as almost always a good thing. Driving is one of the most dangerous things people do.

    • groats_survivor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      On the freeway, good driving habits, like lane discipline, is more safe than reducing speed from 70mph to 65mph

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Speed kills.

        Just an example of a car pedestrian accident: at 50km/h the pedestrian dies more often than survives.

        At 30km/h, only 3% dies.

        I know this isn’t highway speeds, and the example is for the city, but I remember Volvo explaining it’s nearly impossible to die in their cars up to 70km/h (or close, like 68) but over that there is just too much energy at play.

        Also how many seconds are you earning when slightly-speeding? Not very much if you don’t drive the highway for hours and hours.

        Thank you for reading my ramblings.

    • beegnyoshi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think you should still be annoyed. By riding slowly in the fast lane, you are not encouraging people to ride more slowly; you are encouraging them to zip around the lanes which is extremely dangerous too. Further, many people might see a need to compensate for whatever speed they lost and accelerate even more. I would say that it is definitely not a good thing to do, not to mention that I don’t think that it is even legal in my country

      • snackwifi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        False, it is actually the case that collisions are LESS deadly at slower speeds. I know it’s difficult to wrap your mind around, but science is sometimes unintuitive!

        • kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re less deadly, but this maneuver makes them more likely. Overall, it’s more dangerous.

          • snackwifi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s not if people aren’t speeding. You’re just victim blaming. If a car has low visibility and it hits someone, you wouldn’t say, well they should just get out of the way, you’d blame the low visibility. Same situation. If people were not driving recklessly in the left lane, then it wouldn’t be a problem that people are also driving normally in the left lane.

            Don’t bother replying to this I’m not reading this thread anymore.

            • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is “rape whistles shouldn’t be necessary” logic. People are going to speed. You can’t fiat anyone’s behavior but your own.

            • _stranger_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              but they ARE speeding. That’s why they’re in the fast lane. Parking there with speeders pointed at your ass is a bad idea, regardless of your personal moral stance on driving.

              You’ll be right, but you’ll be dead.

              • kurikai@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                If they are speedng then they are breaking the law. Just like someone being in the passing lane while not passing.

                • _stranger_@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Yep. They’ll be in a lot of trouble after they kill you. You’ll be happy that you were right though, yeah? In the afterlife?

                • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It’s much easier to imagine your opponent crying, throwing a tantrum, and pissing everywhere in rage than it is to actually come up with a real response to what they’re saying.

          • WereCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I was trying to explain this to the officer the other day when he caught me playing on my phone and not even bothering to hold the steering wheel

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not very many accidents out in the middle of nowhere highways, although in my experience last holiday season there wasn’t a single jabroni hogging the left lane. Granted, I usually drive everyone back at like 1 am, so mileage may vary.

      You’re absolutely right in the middle of the city though, and the number of people who get angry at you for not going 60 on a 40 mph blvd is way higher than it should be. I got honked at and a guy swerved around me just got both of us to get stuck at the same red. Those are the people who will certainly kill pedestrians.