That’s not quite what I meant.
I’m talking about the (potential) relationship between a gov and repo maintainers, and whether that would mean less freedom for the developers, since govs are typically required to ensure tax money is spent on legitimate purposes.
As I said though, it was just a thought. Things like research grants exist, it could work the same.

This is true, but i fear it would open up a can of worms potentially, where govt oversight would be required or demanded to oversee the investment (people doing no good just trying to cash in). Maybe not.

I feel personally attacked

Really? If I open github (for example) and select passkey login, I just need to press ok using Bitwarden.

Isn’t this optional? I use passkeys and have yet to be asked for anything else in addition to it.

Refresh…Refresh…Refresh…
Send new link…
Message arrives…
‘This link is no longer valid’