Almost two weeks after Republicans lost badly in elections in Georgia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Virginia, many GOP leaders insist there is no problem with the party’s policies, its message or Donald Trump’s leadership.

Trump says Democrats and the media are misleading voters who are concerned about high costs and the economy. Republican officials aiming to avoid another defeat in next fall’s midterms are encouraging candidates to embrace the president fully and talk more about his accomplishments.

Those are the major takeaways from a series of private conversations, briefings and official talking points involving major Republican decision-makers across Washington, including inside the White House, after their party’s losses Nov. 4. Their assessment highlights the extent to which the fate of the Republican Party is tied to Trump, a term-limited president who insists the economy under his watch has never been stronger.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be fair, “avoid change at all costs!” Has been the Republican motto for a long time now. It’s right up there with, “ignore reality.”

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      24 hours ago

      At this point, I actually think the overton window has shifted so far that “avoid changes at all costs” sounds more like the Democrats. “Burn our institutions to the ground. De-orbit the satellites. Rip up all trade agreements. Sell pardons. Shill products from the oval office. Retry supreme court decisions”, those all are big changes.

      Dems… Just keep trying the same exact same bland neoliberal candidates and viciously stonewalling anyone suggesting any meaningful change.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Conservatism has never been about avoiding change. It has always been about preserving the unearned privilege of the ruling class. In England, the enclosures of the commons and the Highlands clearances were both radical changes, starting almost two centuries ago.

        But initially, conservatism was protectionist, since the rich mainly got their money through land ownership, But after the Industrial Revolution, when many fortunes were made from manufacturing and trade, conservativism gradually shifted to supporting free trade (originally a Liberal idea).

        It’s not a consistent ideology, really. It’s just “whatever it takes to serve the rich.”

      • atmorous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I will hopefully suggest all of you look into Run For Something. They have won quote a lot of electionswith young progressive candidates trained up. But they could also use more help.

        Research them/volunteer for them. They take no AIPAC, and members don’t either. Read their Substack: Feel Good RFS Updates for their accomplishments across the country from every month.

        If we all want better we must continue to do together