• suchwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Seen a lot of half baked arguments.

    I’ve been in the area and met this cat. First off, this cat started as a stray, and found its way to the corner store that took it in and adopted it for all intents and purposes. Its lived in the same spot for many years, and had always been an exceptionally chill cat. Painting him as a typical outdoor cat is disingenuous and uninformed.

    KitKat has been safe and sound for so long without any issues. There’s gotta be literally millions of cars that have driven past in his residency on 16th in the Mission district of SF. And the only time he gets hit is by a waymo? All these human drivers, so many of them absolute shit, and never an occurrence? This cat isn’t sprinting the neighborhood, crossing streets, or hunting for prey; its docile, loves pets, and knows there’s endless food at the liquor store that provides all his needs. He wasn’t your typical outdoor cat that runs from everyone and twitches at unknown sounds; this was an urban dwelling cat that’s been prospering for years.

    Waymo promotes and brags to riders how many cameras are inside and out of the car. But it so easily hit something that could fuck the car up if it wasn’t soft squishy flesh. Were animals and small children not in any of its test scenarios? Is it infeasble to install cameras where a typical driver couldn’t usually see?

    Not to mention the absolutely rude response waymo has had to this event. Instead of apologizing and pledging improvements and retribution to killing a valued community member; they victim-blamed the dead cat, said they didn’t do anything wrong, and said nothing of mitigating future scenarios.

    There’s more I can say about the company and its typical ownership, but I want to keep this to the slaughter at hand and their complete lack of consciousness. Waymo doesn’t care about you or anything that it kills. Once again, its about the bottom line and whatever it can do to turn profit.

    Obviously accidents happen, but its the reaction that can truly matter in those cases. They’ve shown that causing great harm in a community means nothing to them. And this is in obvious and outspoken situations. What about the less obvious ways? Whether that be job loss, economic factors, environmental concerns, or blatant safety on our streets. If they’re forced, they’ll make a bullshit apology (aka recognition of events) and then focus on moving forward without addressing people’s grief and anger.

    Fuck waymo, fuck their response especially, and fuck anyone saying this cat deserved it by being a lazy sidewalk-laying pillar of joy in the neighborhood.

    Rest in Peace KitKat. The community will always love you and remember you for always brightening our days in this endlessly threatening world. The only thing that killed you was the ruthless drive for profit. Your memory will live on in the hearts of many. And as a focal point that citizens must stop allowing corporations from plowing down their neighbors, their voice, and their sunshine in a day’s walk to the store.

    3:

    • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      when the LA riots happened a few months ago and they were torching waymo cars i was confused why they would do that, now im ok with thoese cars being torched. fuck waymo, RIP kitkat

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Waymo/Google has aligned itself with Trump and there are a lot of cameras on those cars. I suspect that was a reason back then. Now there’s more.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Don’t want your cat to get hit by a car keep it inside.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    “While our vehicle was stopped to pick up passengers, a nearby cat darted under our vehicle as it was pulling away”

    I mean, it sucks, but it could’ve happened with a human driver as well… and likely has happened.

    I have rode in a Waymo and it shows you all the things it detects on a screen… which includes humans and small animals. It’s not a perfect machine, but it probably is a better driver than a lot of people already and it’s learning every day.

    I suppose this incident could get Waymo to put cameras/sensors beneath the car… something that regular car makers won’t think about.

    But yeah, it should’ve detected the cat beforehand and waited for it to leave before driving off. Then again, the human passengers didn’t see it either.

    • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Under- car sensors is a great idea and the kind of innovation required for this tech to reach universal adoption. Waymo is already safer than human drivers IMO but let’s keep going until it’s significantly safer with verifiable data and capabilities humans cannot have. And we have to address its connection to big tech for “safety under fascism” purposes.

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Before anyone starts to think there’s a good guy in this story:

    some have taken upon themselves to honor KitKat in distinctly Silicon Valley-style ways. Zeidan (part of cats family) has released a memecoin honoring KitKat’s legacy, and also said that he was disappointed to see others launch their own imitation tokens in an attempt to profit off KitKat’s death.

    He says he’s going to use the money to support local vets, but why don’t you just share some links to spca to donate directly, you’re providing nothing but a way for you to grift by taking the money through meme coins.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Or even better: Be the “good guy” by giving your cat a happy, healthy, secure, and longer life by keeping them indoors. People hate to be told what to do, and some cats love it outside, but guess what? My dog would love to eat 10lbs of chocolate. We have to look out for their best interests. This obviously doesn’t mean don’t ever take them outside leashed or supervised, but the fact remains: indoor cats have a better, less stressful life, and don’t decimate local bird populations…

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        I always ask people how they would think about my Dog coming into their garden unsupervised, shitting and pissing all over the place, digging out flowers and fighting with other Dogs. I’m sure they would be less than thrilled and yet the same is okay for cats.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    People who keep their kids inside but let their pets play in traffic are psychopaths.

    I know what I said.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Yes I read it, there is no owner mentioned in that article, and it was very obviously a stray cat.

              Your quote is just an example of the fact that Waymo has a canned, boilerplate template ready to go for when they run over an animal.

        • sfgifz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Did you ask some AI to summarise the article? Because there’s no mention of it being a pet cat.

                • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  The article is relaying information from an authoritative group of people who are informing the article, (those who know the cat and are being interviewed for the purpose of this article) and Waymo (Who is unfamiliar with the cat besides the point that they’ve confirmed they ran it over, and did not speak to the Guardian for this article).

                  There is no mention of an owner from that authoritative group of people.

                  The letter sent out by Waymo is not an authoritative source of information for this cat, nor is it asserting that the cat does in fact have an owner. It’s just an uninformed assumption by a third party with no first hand knowledge of this cat in order to cover a base because it’s boilerplate. An owner is mentioned in it for the same purpose as the phrase “To whom it may concern”

                  You have got to work on your media literacy.

    • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Used to go to SF for work events.

      It felt like a town that once had culture that still wants to peek out, but it almost entirely covered with silicon valley monotony and misanthropic policies. It feels like a city where the people living there are the after thought, and the tablet where you order your coffee while you sit around a room where nobody makes eye contact or speaks to you is the product.

      I’m sure there’s a part of the city where humanity still thrives, but it should be a cultural warning to those who are adopting silicon valley cures as anything other than snake oil.