Things should be allowed by default, if someone wants to ban something the onus is on them to prove that the ban is necessary which by their own admission they have failed to do in this case.

The decision resulted from a health ministry finding of a lack of “high-quality evidence that demonstrates the benefits or risks”, Brown added in a statement.

Don’t give up looking for your person, there are people out there who like programmers a lot (NSFW)

Pestilence is sick, war is injured, hunger ducked off to get a toastie and death… don’t even ask.

Yep it definitely could but people might scroll without reading the article, maybe they think there’s another article underneath or maybe they’re just scrolling to see how long it is. Clicking read more gives a less noisy signal I would think.

Good question. Analytics maybe?

If you think it would be fun, go for it. You can always stop if it turns out you don’t enjoy it as much as you thought but we can always do with more humans writing interesting things.

Missed opportunity with the zoom percentage but solid effort.

Ok thank you, it was worth a try.

What if I’m underwater?