It’s not only that 10% is wrong, it’s knowing which 10% is wrong, which is more important than it seems at first glance. I feel strongly that AI is contributing to people’s inability to really perceive reality. If you direct all your learning through a machine that lies 10% of the time, soon enough your entire world-view will be on shaky ground. How are you going to have a debate with someone when you don’t know which parts of your knowledge are true? Will you automatically concede your knowledge to others, who may be more convincing and less careful about repeating what they’ve learned through AI?
I think all that AI really needs to do is translate natural language requests (“What factors led to WW2?”) into normal destinations for further learning. Letting AI try to summarize those destinations seems like a bad idea (at least with where the technology is right now)
Absolutely not trusting this. Uninstalling until we know more, and ideally just getting a different solution entirely. A new account tried to impersonate Catfriend1 directly at first, and then they switched to researchxxl when someone called it out (both are new accounts). Meanwhile the original Catfriend1 has provided no information about this, and we only have the new person’s word as to what’s going on. There’s way too many red flags here.