• 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 8th, 2024

help-circle
  • Trumps literally on deaths door and is the #1 suspect in what’s likely the largest conspiracy in US history involving child traffickers and their political protectors.

    He’s been in US politics the last 10 years.

    He’s run his course. And no one is left to replace him.

    He’s also killed millions with his Covid policy. Millions more with USAID defunding. And now likely even more with SNAP and ACA cuts.

    He also likely won by cheating, not by popularity.

    He’s just about cooked from every angle imaginable and is not long for this world.


  • The end of your previous post:

    Yes, it’s better than other vanity projects, but it is still a wasteful vanity project.

    The literal definition of a vanity project:

    https://dictionary.reverso.net/english-definition/vanity+project

    project undertaken for self-satisfaction.

    Each one of the examples I provided shows very clearly this yacht was NOT made for HIS self-satisfaction. Rather, it was literally made to the satisfaction of the research team that uses the yacht.

    Specifically:

    “His” yacht being used to better the scientific community instead of just him.

    1. Made quite literally for a large team of scientists as he is the second largest contributor to deep sea research on the planet. Nearly the exact opposite of being for vanity.

    “His” yacht made to have the least environmental impact from noise or oil pollution.

    1. Made for the environment. Not Gabe. So not for vanity.

    Huge efforts were made to reduce noise and vibration, thereby creating a pleasant onboard environment.

    1. Made for sensative aquatic life that engine noises can disturb and affect the research of. Not for Gabe. So not for vanity.

    “His” yacht made to have little maintenance requirements so the crew can focus on science and research.

    1. Made to be easy to work on for the hundreds of crew that maintain it. Not for Gabe. So not for vanity.

    Every point of my last comment was proving your statement about this being a vanity project completely and unquestionably wrong. But I guess I just understand your last sentence better than you.

    You are shitting on the best deep sea scientific research vessel in existence while implying you have the moral high ground. There’s nothing immoral about scientific research just because it happens on a yacht.

    You are literally using the same logic as a cop saying a person with dark skin is a criminal. This yacht clearly isn’t a vanity project. It is for Inksea, and being used to help fight climate change and the affect that has on deep sea ocean currents.

    But to you this yacht is just as criminal as a dark skinned person is to a cop. No exceptions.

    Please understand: the point you are making is not incorrect. But the way you are making it very much is.

    I completely agree that Billionaires shouldn’t exist, and in general most yachts are unquestionably vanity projects. But this one clearly isn’t.

    So if you want to make your point heard, going about it through uncompromising bigotry is just about the worst way to make it.


  • The Ken Starr report that lead to Clinton’s impeachment begs to differ.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starr_Report

    Many of the details reveal highly personal information; many are sexually explicit…Because Starr’s office allegedly leaked portions to press about sexual details that were mentioned in his report, he was criticized for using the scandal as a political maneuver and was charged for violating legal ethics by presenting information irrelevant to an investigation as evidence of legal wrongdoing.

    That report is ten times the size of the 9-11 report btw.

    Reading the charges now is hilarious considering Trump is guilty of the same hundreds, possibly thousands of times over.


  • It’s his vessel because he paid for it. That’s how money works. There’s no other pronoun that is appropriate.

    Here’s the rest of the article that completely unwinds how far you want to stretch that term:

    “His” yacht made through collaboration:

    “Not only have we designed a very unusual yacht that leans into Oceanco’s strengths of innovation and design, but the team has also been willing to collaborate with us on evolving the process.”

    “His” yacht made to have the least environmental impact from noise or oil polution (Diesel hybrid electric engine):

    Huge efforts were made to reduce noise and vibration, thereby creating a pleasant onboard environment. The hybrid diesel-electric propulsion system is whisper-quiet, and the engine room is positioned further forward to reduce noise. The built-in battery bank also allows for silent nighttime operation.

    “His” yacht made to have little maintenance requirements so the crew can focus on science and research:

    Leviathan is also incredibly low-maintenance. The off-white exterior and synthetic handrails require less cleaning, for example. That means the crew can spend less time on routine maintenance and more time on more important tasks. “We adopted a crew-centric approach that really digs into how Leviathan is operated and maintained,” explains Newell.

    “His” thoughts on “His” yacht being used to better the scientific community instead of just him.

    “Yachts have great potential to serve as platforms for scientific research,” adds Newell. “It’s about recognizing that you’re part of a broader community and ensuring the yacht’s presence adds value to the communities around it.”

    How about you ask yourself how many scientists and engineers HE paid to have a job to work on this?

    How about you ask how much he pays their research salaries still and provided them a better vessel to do their job on than anyone else?

    Why do you insist that you know how to better spend his money when it’s already going to people that need it for a cause that’s needed?

    Just because you want to claim his money could be used better doesn’t mean it currently isn’t being used well.

    You just see a yacht and think the worse. Worlds far less black and white.


  • Like the 3000 scientists, engineers, and designers that helped him build that yacht for research?

    That collaboration started with the design and build. Newell joined forces with YTMC, Y.CO, the Oceanco Design team, Lateral Naval Architects, Mark Berryman Design, and thousands of designers, engineers, and other experts to bring his dream vessel to fruition. The names of the nearly 3,000 contributors are listed near the main staircase, in fact. “It is this level of collaboration that sets Leviathan apart from anything we’ve built before,” Oceanco CEO Marcel Onkenhout said in a statement.

    Is there more efficient ways to spend this money on research? Sure. But don’t equate this effort as meaningless just because it’s not perfect. It’s a great place to be a researcher, but it’s still for research.


  • Your assumption all his yachts were for pleasure has already been proven wrong. Now you’re just moving the goal posts.

    As I said, he’s the second largest doner to marine research on the entire planet, and the burden of proof for proving his yachts are ALL for personal use is something you’ve never provided, only assumed.

    I’ve proved 1/3 were for scientific research. I’m not going to do the other 2/3 just for you to ignore and move the goal posts elsewhere.

    Prove your point, and I’ll believe it.

    Until then, he’s still a billionaire instead of the trillionaire he could be, so I’m not going to think poorly of him just because he’s not fitting some arbitrary number of currency tied to his worth that magically makes you think he’s moral.

    Instead I will judge him based on his actions. The ones that I have detailed have unquestionably made the world a better place for many more people than him.

    How about you actually tell me something he’s done wrong that’s worth your judgement, instead of basing it entirely on yachts you won’t research?


  • What have I said that isn’t true?

    https://robbreport.com/motors/marine/billionaire-gabe-newell-oceanco-gigayacht-leviathan-1237360429/

    The 364-foot Leviathan was designed for billionaire gaming visionary Gabe Newell, who acquired the Dutch shipyard this past April.

    Leviathan is the latest addition to Newell’s Inkfish fleet and will be used to further scientific research in the marine sector. Occupying the place of the standard beach club is a fully equipped dive center, laboratory, and a hospital. There’s even a 3-D printing workshop where the crew can create spare or replacement parts. “Yachts have great potential to serve as platforms for scientific research,” adds Newell. “It’s about recognizing that you’re part of a broader community and ensuring the yacht’s presence adds value to the communities around it.”

    You are just continuing to make assumptions based entirely on the assets he owns instead of his behaviour.

    Something I keep pointing out, and is why I have also been responding.

    I am completely on your side and feel that anyone with over a billion is an ethical and moral burden. However, I’m also wise enough to recognize that as a goal to strive towards not a destination to judge against. So I’m not going to chastise those actively working towards that goal, even if they are a billionaire.


  • I see granting access for anyone to make games for Steam as a good cause.

    The opportunity cost for what profit could be made by closing that is multitudes of yachts worth.

    Just because you do not value this as a good cause does not mean it is not.

    Does Gabe have more yachts than are needed? Yes. But again, you can’t just say he’s greedy because he has them. That’s being incredibly biased.

    Instead, how about you tell me what actions of his has made him greedy that don’t involve his assets?

    I can name hundreds of ways Musk should be drawn and quartered based on his actions that have nothing to do with his wealth, but rather his actual documented choices.

    What choices / actions / or anything of actual greed has Gabe done that you can point to?

    It’s like saying anything with a swastika on it is for Nazis without realizing Hindus have been using a right oriented Swastika to represent good fortune for hundreds of years.

    Gabe Newall has done the following with his 11 Billion fortune:

    • Co-founded “The Heart of Racing” car racing team that raises money for Children’s charity.

    • Donates heavily to the Seattle Children’s Hospital and several others around the world.

    • Founded Foundry10, a non profit education company that helps neuro divergent kids learn through new methods of education

    • Started InkFish to expand the scientific study of our oceans and is now the second highest individual donor towards marine research on the planet.

    https://80.lv/articles/gabe-newell-reportedly-plans-to-invest-usd300-million-to-marine-research

    That’s why he has those yachts.

    Same reason Hindus have their swastikas.

    Their actions speak louder than the symbols they use suggest. Even when those symbols are Yachts.

    He has 11 Billion. Everyone else even close to his level of market control has several magnitudes more. Why does he have so little when he owns a virtual monopoly on digital distribution?

    Because he’s not in it for maximizing his bank account.


  • The dispicableness of billionaires is measured by their actions not their worth. And despite being of high worth, Gabes actions are unquestionably not greedy. He’s doing almost everything he can to minimize his wealth in favor of equality to access Steam as a game dev.

    If he wanted to, he could charge far more than $100 to develop for them, and buy several more yachts.

    But he hasn’t.

    Which makes his platform more popular. And in turn brings him even more cash to buy more yachts.

    His yachts aren’t indicative of his greed, but his benevolence in the face of it.

    Show me a single other company the size of Valve that has chosen to forgo profit over access to something like Steam to make money yourself. That’s basically non existent in the year 2025 aside from Valve. I’m not going to judge Gabe as a bad person for profiting from that. He could be profiting much much more and is choosing access for nearly everyone else instead.


  • I agree with this sentiment, but given a choice, I believe Gabe would make the right one and spend his wealth to lose billionaire status.

    His supposed exploitation was not by his own design, but rather by luck - the sheer benefit of riding a privately owned and benevelontly steered surfboard on top of the waves of a collapsing capitalist society.

    Basically, there’s a meme about all other companies shooting themselves in the foot so Gabe always benefits, and part of that is in the way those companies fucked and manipulated their control of capital and markets. Gabe benefits just by being one of the few that can afford to participate in that system others rigged.

    So he simply rigs it the least, and wins by providing the platform with the least greedy problems. Far far less than he could given his position.

    IMHO, despite all controversies, Steams cut of profits from providing equal access to game visibility despite creator, nationality, background, etc, has legitimately opened the door for nearly anyone to be successful on their platform. For all the tools and services they provide, they ask for literally the smallest cut compared to any other publishing platform.

    Gabe could destroy that to his benefit on a whim, and instead he over designs it to make it possible for nearly anyone to try game dev if they do the work needed to develop for them.

    To hold so much capital simply for providing some form of equality to access the same in a system that overwhelming benefits others with more resources is in no way greedy imo. It’s being the person with the only fire extinguisher who knows how to use it in a burning building: popular.