

Looking forward to “Operation Spitroast” and “Operation 69”


Looking forward to “Operation Spitroast” and “Operation 69”


“I saw this on the internet and made up a story about it”


The implication is incorrect.


Having sex with your wife exactly once a year to avoid seeming too gay to the homies.


Some parts of the bible are shown to have been written about 400 years later


Afaik these things are not approved of by any churches or religious organizations.
If you ask them if Jesus would suck a dick to save a soul none of them give the correct answer.


This also opens the door to trump having blown putin
Weird how the ‘free speech™’ people seem to be very upset about speech such that they’re buying or harrassing every single media outlet in existence.
Autism is where you get upset when observations of reality don’t line up with what the elite republicans tell us reality is.
Obviously the only acceptable punishment for this kind of wokeness is death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubus_armeniacus
Since it’s drought resistant its flourishing in climate change.
Himelayan blackberries are invasive


There’s at least one boy in the epstein victims. So its probably more that Epstein was bi.
Judging by how shitty the world has become they already have. I wouldn’t be surprised if billionaires test social media algorithms and fox programs on people with a brain scanning hat on to make sure the racism center of the brain is lighting up
2015 oof. Obviously the god killing athiest magnets didn’t pan out
What’s funny is I think he was thinking of electronics (remember the shark vs electric boats dementia babble he did?) but if he had said fire instead of water it would be correct wrt magnets.
From what I’ve seen Feyman was more than a little pedantic and he liked to emphasize that science doesn’t answer “why” it answers “how”. So if ICP asked that question Feyman would say “take an undergrad physics course because its not easy to explain in a soundbite”


Truth is ugly. Fiction is neat and tidy.
Sure. I’m just saying we should be getting some kind of real tangible benefit rather than some kind of bifurcated ponzi scheme.
This is the post you replied to
The implication was that it was not correct because of a reply that starts with: