It’s exactly because of his NPD that we want to perpetrate these rumors until he shits himself with 79yo indignancy. We literally do not care what the truth is when this man uses fabrications as his primary weapon. He Monika’d a democrat to get into politics. End of story.
It’s more about probing specifically where to look if you want to find dirty laundry when looking for security-clearance candidates. They don’t assume you lied when you said you didn’t do hard drugs, but your body did react to that question deliberately in a way that suggests maybe we should look into a history of drug abuse before we accept you reading about sensitive topics.
Or sexual scandal blackmail waiting to happen is a great way to get… state secrets… in the… hands of… Oh hey, they raided Mar a Lago, lookit that…
I wonder if we could pressure the BBC or PBS into pushing these videos to force Google/Israel to do this even more blatantly.
Let me clarify. They do not use polygraph tests alone to determine when someone is lying. They use it to determine the priorities of how resources get devoted to uncovering what might become a security risk for any individual. This is common, good sense practice when handling classified information. It’s OpSec. It should be happening to keep us safe. Even if it’s, say, 80% accurate under optimal conditions, that saves time and money when devoting resources into invading the personal life of a classification candidate. It helps catch the bad candidates early, unlike what’s happening here.