Rothe

Why does fascist regimes never last 50 years? Because a powerful alliance of countries relentlessly vanquish them, historically. No such powerful alliance is present today. You should not make historical rules of whay is not rules at all. You have learnt the wrong lesson from history.

Is it though? Mussolini ruled in Italy 21 years, Hitler ruled for 15. And the reason both of them fell was on account of the very concerted effort of an extremely powertul alliance of foreign powers waging unrelenting war against them both for years. Otherwise they would have ruled to their natural deaths, and their heirs would have taken over.

What happened during WWII is not a scenario which is likely to occur in present day US. There is no powerful alliance going to wage unrelenting war against the US fascist government. On the contrary China and Russia applauds what is going on.

Your comment is a good example of why history doesn’t repeat itself, even though much of it is very recognisable.

Of course not, but I don’t think anybody suggested that.

Not if US fascism continues to reign for the next 50 years. Then she will proudly brag to her grandchildren that she was among the pioneers who supported the Great Leader in his early struggles against decadent Western socialism. And her grandchildren will listen in awe and wonder at how brave their grandmother was in fighting to get rid of all the socialist islamist terrorists.

I’m not familiar with either.

To them it is a qualification.

Sure, but the OP doesn’t say “gender warriors”, it says “Western man”, which includes a whole lot more people than the tiny minority of those bigots.

Sorry that you live in a bubble of bigots, but it is not a general or universal experience.

Yes, but they both share fond memories of racism and other forms of bigotry.

Hypocrisy is baked into fascism, so unfortunately it has no effect to catch them in it.

It has been said some time ago that “conservatism” (aka fascism) “consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect”.

“Fake news!” they would cry. That reality denying phrase was unsurprisingly part of his political career from the very beginning for a reason.

Because it is so much easier to do PR when you don’t have to cater to boring things like facts, but instead the lowest common denominator of very stupid people.

Tits is acceptable too.

Ilku means basically the same as corvée, I think the translater has thrown corvée in there as an explanation of ilku, so means doing feudal labour service. So they are complaining that the mandatory labour service is beneath them, with the excuse that it interferes with their more cushy jobs of stargazing and teaching.

Indeed, it is not apocryphal, but canon. It is part of scripture and god’s word, regardless of who said it in the text.

it ought to be called a forgery

That is basically the entirety of the bible though.

You should read up on the concept of the Canon. They are part of the New Testament, which is part of the Bible, which is Scripture. This is objective fact. There is no slinking away from that even if the words may disturb you.

It is not the Bible nor God saying women should be silent. Instead it is Paul telling Timothy that they should not preach in Timothy’s ministry.

That is disingenous, because the Pauline epistles are definitely part of canonical bible scripture in almost all denominations, and has been used as such by Christians as well in the past.

It doesn’t really change that its main component is bread and cheese, with a very low content of vegetables. But sure, better than the extremely low bar you set for yourself.

It really isn’t though. Low on fibres and high on carbs.