Just a smol with big opinions about AFVs and data science. The onlyfans link is a rickroll.
I suspect the downvotes are more because you’re behaving like someone who gets downvoted and calls people “depressed illiterates” as a cope, rather than general unawareness of pedophila’s role as a vice of the powerful throughout history.
It’s not that straightforward - pinephones have varying results depening on carriers, Verizon is notorious for blacklisting them while most of the other major carriers are hit or miss on if you’ll get penalized.
I have a pine phone - they’re super neat because linux on a phone! but… not really usable yet. Not getting texts, random bugs (they fixed the one where you could only receive calls, not make them, but that took a year or more), incredibly laggy UI even just trying to navigate,the battery life is abysmal, the battery management hardware is lacking and the software is even worse, the UIs that exist are poorly supported, basic apps are decently represented but anything not built for mobile is going to be godawful to get working (esp. through something like waydroid), the UI stabbed my puppy, the devices are so underpowered you’re gonna be unable to do things like have two apps open at once or have a video playing in one tab while trying to navigate in another…
The pro phone has supposedly improved the hardware issues, but it’s new and niche enough that I haven’t seen much of a consens emerge (or hardly any in depth testing at all, really). Fairphone is much more usuable, still not without it’s glitches but much better than the pinephones.
That’s not really the point. Sure you could argue this, but why the hell are we wasting our time arguing about if the stupid detail of him mixing up a word is actually relevant, instead of talking about the "he’s trying to send troops to defend a street" thing? That is my point. I don’t care if people think it’s a sign of cognitive decline, I care that you’re choosing to spend your time talking about that instead of the thing that really pressingly matters.
I’ve repeatedly explained my reasoning and position.
And now you’re trying cheap bait and personal attacks. Charming.
Ah, so now we’re pivoting from discussing my actual criticism of the article and how it spawns meaningless discussions to… another meaningless discussion, but this time with random gatekeeping thrown in.
Was this in any way consequential? Does this show any evidence of anything besides mispeaking? Wait no don’t answer that, I spectacularly don’t care. Instead of talking about something that actually matters you’re starting to drag us both into a debate about the evidentiary value of an old guy briefly mixing up two names that both start with ‘m’.
Isn’t, just maybe, that he’s trying to get troops deployed in US soil once again perhaps a little more important to discuss? But somehow that’s getting overshadowed by your eagerness to spar over the meaningless bullshit I’m criticizing, in a perfect example of my entire godsdamned point.
I’m not, I’m criticizing this article taking up just that little bit more of the public’s bandwidth with stupid rhetoric. There’s more than enough that we should be worrying about and ample crimes he’s guilty of, why do we need to bother manufacturing evidence when there’s already overwhelming mountains of evidence just laying around? All this does is discredit our legitimate criticism by association and take up visual space that could be filled with real news.
He’s calling for them to protect a real mall, he got the name of the mall wrong (and not even that egregiously). There’s plenty of legitimately horrifying acts to criticize this fucker for, why are we resorting to the same kind of disingenuous truth-stretching rhetoric conservatives rely on to rile their degenerate base?
Good, that was our goal all along!
I want a girl with a short skirt and a LOOOOOOONG skirt underneath it so I cant see her ankles.
They’re non-harmful if you eat them, but they’re also not compostable and need to be removed before being disposed of.