In what way is DT more powerful than LR? When I used DT like 2 years ago it couldn’t do half the shit that LR has as basic functions, much less the crazier stuff.

Keep digging your hole. Until you give a reason you’re just a troll.

Oh look, that rhymed. My comment has more value than anything you’ve said so far.

Edit: oh look the troll is now private messaging and abusing even more.

PolyCam is free. You can also use photogrammetry and free software to model it yourself. It’s not complicated but takes a beefy computer.

So you have no reason and are claiming it’s consumerism. There’s no physical product. It’s not consumerism. You’re just a troll and a fucking moron too.

Obvious troll is obvious. If you weren’t a troll you’d give a reason.

Didn’t they literally do exactly that? That’s what Cambridge analytica was all about.

It’s kinda understandable, but you should reasonably assume that Firefox did it first and anything chrome does after the fact followed that, unless Google thinks it will help them keep a tighter grip on the market, like Manifest V3.

I mean, Firefox has had profiles for years before chrome did. And then they had multi-account containers and chrome still doesn’t have those. And now they have a new distinct feature that they’ve given the same name of profiles that is just slightly different from the already existing profiles feature.

The post is just misinformation to act like they removed it. See ricecake’s comment above. https://programming.dev/comment/20479780

The post is just misinformation to act like they removed it. See ricecake’s comment above. https://programming.dev/comment/20479780

Not even intermediate. He makes so many bad calls that it’s honestly great to watch him to know what not to do. You’ll be right about 95+% of the time.

I had to stop watching him though because I’d spend hours writing up comments to correct everything he said.

I text them my full profile so they can just click it and save it all.

I thought that was a leg and got very confused

There is functionally no benefit to using bash and there hasn’t been for over a decade. Even macOS transitioned to the default shell being zsh. In terms of user friendliness, fish outcompetes zsh and bash handily. The only other shell I’ve heard ‘beats’ fish is nushell. But I’ll never go back to zsh or bash. Needing to drop into bash to run a script can always be done if you need it, but your scripts will be easier to read in fish.

Yeah it was showing the correct time and right tick speed. But it was only one of the clocks on that model. The rest were wrong.

I’m confused what the goal is here

deepseek v3.1 had an (almost) perfect clock once for me.

Stopped reading when the author suggested caring about chrome and safari but then said “who cares about it (Firefox) anymore”.